slides: New PawSox Deal in RI: Cost of Borrowing Increases to $85M — 16% Increase
Email to a friend
Permalink
Friday, December 08, 2017
GoLocalWorcester News Team
Larry Lucchino
The new PawSox deal is out and the amount of bonding requested for of the project increased by 16 percent for Rhode Island taxpayers.
The new number in bonding to fund the deal is now $85 million up from $73 million.
Despite the PawSox refusing to share their finances, Senate Finance Committee on Thursday issued a new report and revised legislation with the new pricing. As GoLocal previously reported, legislative action on the PawSox will be pushed to next session of the legislature in 2018.
“The legislation responds to the concerns raised during the committee process. It strengthens what was already a good deal for the city and the state, and provides a mutually beneficial path forward to keep the PawSox in Pawtucket,” said Finance Committee Chairman William J. Conley, Jr. (D – Dist. 18, East Providence, Pawtucket).
“The committee engaged in a vigorous review of this proposal, and now more than ever I believe it is a good deal for the city and the state. Even under the most conservative estimates, the public revenue generated by the PawSox for the state would fully account for the state’s debt service, meaning the stadium pays for itself. This revised legislation enables the continuation of the partnership that exists today at McCoy Stadium in a new and better-located ballpark that will jumpstart development in downtown Pawtucket.
“Throughout this process,” he continued, “the Senate Finance Committee has been committed not only to being thorough, but also to being as open and transparent as possible. In that spirit, the legislation brought forward today was not voted upon, but made available for the public to review prior to our consideration of the bill next month.”
"“If the report leads to legislation that is ultimately passed by the Senate, then the House Finance Committee will give it a full and fair public hearing,” said Speaker of the House Nick Mattiello in an email to GoLocal.
GoLocal requested comment from Senate President Dominick Ruggerio.
READ THE NEW PROVISIONS IN THE BILL BELOW
Related Slideshow: New PawSox Deal—December, 2017
Prev
Next
Compliance with Public Corporation Debt Management Act: The legislation was amended to better conform to the requirements of the State’s Public Corporation Debt Management Act, or “Kushner Act.” The Budget Office’s fiscal note indicated that the bill as originally written did not meet these requirements. The statute requires that financing leases to which the state is a party must be authorized by the General Assembly through resolution. The resolution must include the maximum possible obligation of the state. The original language only listed the value of the principal to be borrowed and not the cost of issuance and total debt service. The amended language more clearly identifies the maximums as $41.0 million, $26.0 million, and $18.0 million for the Series A, B, and C bonds respectively.
Prev
Next
Naming Rights: Based on the fact that the Pawtucket’s redevelopment agency will be the owner of the new ballpark and the determination that Pawtucket will experience a gap between new revenue and its annual debt obligation until sufficient ancillary development has taken place, S-0989 was amended to direct 50 percent of the ballpark naming rights revenue to the City of Pawtucket to assist with its annual debt service payment. This revenue is estimated to be $250,000.
Prev
Next
Ticket Pricing: Based on the determination that Pawtucket will experience a gap between new revenue and its annual debt obligation until sufficient ancillary development has taken place, S-0989 was amended to reflect the transfer of the premium ticket surcharge revenue from the state to the city. The bill clarifies the definition of a “ticket” and was amended to include language memorializing the team’s commitment not to raise ticket prices for five years.
Prev
Next
50K sq. ft. Ancillary Development: The legislation requires any future lease to include a provision that the team develop a minimum of 50,000 sq. ft. of real estate contemporaneously with the construction of the ballpark.
Prev
Next
Maintenance and Capital Improvement: S-0989 was amended so that any future lease must contain a requirement that the team is responsible for the daily, operational maintenance of the ballpark and its costs. The lease must also explicitly make clear that the state is not responsible for operational maintenance. The lease shall require that the team be responsible for a minimum 50 percent of annual capital expenditures and that the city, state, and team must contribute a minimum of $150,000 in total per year into a capital expenditure fund to finance capital expenditures. The parties will be required to develop a multi-year capital improvement plan detailing expected, future capital projects and outlays. No capital expenditure funds shall be used for operational maintenance.
Prev
Next
Construction Costs: The $12.0 million of equity pledged by team owners is required by the legislation to be the first funds expended towards the construction costs of the new ballpark. In the event that land acquisition and ballpark construction costs come in less than $83.0 million, the savings shall be distributed on a pro-rata basis to the team, city, and state at a rate of 46.5 percent, 32.4 percent, and 21.1 percent respectively. Lastly, any construction cost overruns that exist will be paid by the team.
Prev
Next
Public Park: The bill memorializes the commitment by the parties of making the new ballpark available as a public park facility. The bill requires the lease to contain a provision directing the city to provide planning and operational assistance on public park aspects of the park. The lease must also specify that the facility will be operated year-round in and around the ballpark, separate and apart from the ballpark’s baseball-related uses, in order to create public recreational, social, and communal benefits.
Prev
Next
Green Design & RIIB Financing: S-0989 was amended to encourage the use of energy efficient and sustainable design, construction, and operations at the new ballpark. It encourages the use of financing programs available through the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank, including, to the extent practicable, the State Revolving Funds and the Efficient Buildings Fund, which provide low cost financing for eligible renewable and energy efficiency, stormwater abatement, water conservation, and other sustainable infrastructure projects.
Prev
Next
Fair Labor Standards Act Compliance: The legislation was amended to affirm the requirement that the team comply with fair labor standards. Employers associated with the business of the ballpark, including the team, would be required to adhere to state and federal Fair Labor Standards practices, including provisions that prevent labor misclassification by incorrectly designating workers as “independent contractors.”
Prev
Next
Lease Conditions: The lease is required to be for 30 years and must be reviewed and approved by the State Properties Commission prior to the issuance of bonds.
Prev
Next
Eminent Domain: Based on the concerns expressed during public testimony and a subsequent determination that the need for this expansion was overstated, S-0990 was amended to eliminate the expansion of eminent domain powers under the Redevelopment Act and to restore the definition of “blighted and substandard” throughout the bill.
Related Articles
- What’s Next for the PawSox?
- Will Worcester Look Bad if New Bedford Ends Up with PawSox?
- 12 Reasons Why the PawSox Move to Providence is in Peril
- Will City Subsidize Public Funds to Let Billionaires Bring PawSox to Worcester?
- PawSox Owners Drop Public Relations Team Following Failed Providence Bid
- 10 Things That Need to Happen to Get PawSox to Worcester
- City Councilors Make Pitch for PawSox to Come to Worcester
- Pawsox: Playoffs trump development this time around
- PawSox Search For National Anthem Singer In Central Mass
- The PawSox Do The Harlem Shake
- Who Will Land the PawSox - Could Worcester, Springfield, or Fall River?
- VIDEO - What the PawSox Stadium Would Look Like in Worcester
- Whitcomb Says Chances of PawSox Going to Worcester are Slim
- Robert Whitcomb: Christmas for RI’s Public Unions; Worcester Pitching the PawSox; Thayer St. Churn
- Robert Whitcomb: Worcester Wouldn’t Well for PawSox; Taxing Away the Little Guys? Racial Fire
- Democrats, Labor Stack Hearing for PawSox Funding Scheme at RI State House
- Facing Overwhelming Public Opposition for PawSox Deal in RI, What is Next for Owners
- 2 Worlds: All White PawSox Owners & Staff, Asking Pawtucket - 40% Minority & Poor - for Millions
- Robert Whitcomb: PawSox Play, Watergate Summer De Luxe
- Not So Fast Worcester, Lucchino Says PawSox Are Slowing Down The Relocation Process
- Has the PawSox Brand Been Damaged This Year?
- Rice, Boggs & Mondor to be Inducted Into PawSox Hall of Fame
- Hey RI, We Want the PawSox in Worcester, Guest MINDSETTER™ Quist
- PawSox Deal Looks Dead for 2017, RI Speaker Mattiello Raises Concerns
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Email to a friend
Permalink
Follow us on Pinterest Google + Facebook Twitter See It Read It