Welcome! Login | Register
 

Worcester Police Officer and Local Boy Drown in Accident, and in Braintree 2 Police Shot, K-9 Killed—Worcester Police Officer and Local Boy Drown in…

Person of Interest Named in Molly Bish Case By Worcester County DA—Person of Interest Named in Molly Bish Case…

Bravehearts Escape Nashua With a Win, 9th Inning Controversy—Bravehearts Escape Nashua With a Win, 9th Inning…

Worcester Regional Research Bureau Announces Recipients of 2021 Awards—Worcester Regional Research Bureau Announces Recipients of 2021…

16 Year Old Shot, Worcester Police Detectives Investigating Shooting at Crompton Park—16 Year Old Shot, Worcester Police Detectives Investigating…

Feds Charge Former MA Pizzeria Owner With PPP Fraud - Allegedly Used Loan to Purchase Alpaca Farm—Feds Charge Former MA Pizzeria Owner With PPP…

Facebook’s independent Oversight Board on Wednesday announced it has ruled in favor of upholding the—Trump's Facebook Suspension Upheld

Patriots’ Kraft Buys Hamptons Beach House for $43 Million, According to Reports—Patriots’ Kraft Buys Hamptons Beach House for $43…

Clark Alum Donates $6M to Support Arts and Music Initiatives—Clark Alum Donates $6M to Support Arts and…

CVS & Walgreens Have Wasted Nearly 130,000 Vaccine Doses, According to Report—CVS & Walgreens Have Wasted Nearly 130,000 Vaccine…

 
 

Are Confidential Informants Compromising Crime Fighting in Central MA?

Thursday, June 12, 2014

 

Confidential informants and snitches have long been associated with helping police to catch criminals especially in drug related crimes, but criminal justice experts in Central Massachusetts are beginning to wonder whether they are an efficient way to fight crime.

While able to offer police an inside scoop into the crime world by giving them a person on the inside, the lack of regulation and monitoring of criminal informants often leads to a wide array of issues, most notably faulty convictions.

“One of the major problems with confidential informants is that the information that they give up could be completely fabricated,” said Bill McCarthy, a criminal justice professor at Quinsigamond Community College. “These informants are believed to be of help to the criminal justice system but you really have to consider how reliable they are.”

Last September, the city of Lowell and local police officer Thomas Lafferty were sued for long-term misuse of criminal informants, who were allegedly planting drugs on innocent people. A total of 17 drug and firearm cases in Lowell were dropped after a police-informant probe was issued.

Faulty Motivation

According to Gregory Casale, a criminal defense attorney in Worcester, Central Massachusetts is full of confidential informants from the largest cities all the way to the smallest towns. While able to help police in drug busts and other crimes, these informants are often misguided in their motives; they are looking to find any information possible that could lead to a conviction.

Confidential informants are often given some form of deal by the police; if they aid in catching a criminal, then the informant may see a reduced or eliminated sentence. Because of this, they oftentimes will report misinformation just to see an arrest, all in an attempt to get a reduced sentence on their own crime.

“I think that ultimately, confidential informants are more of a problem for the criminal justice system,” said Casale. “These informants are out for their own personal gains and not for the good of the public. There should be a larger effort to use undercover police officers whose job it is to serve the public so that the good of the people is kept in mind.”

Solving Crime

While the integrity of criminal informants has been continually questioned, many within the law enforcement field in Central Massachusetts view these informants as a great way to help catch criminals.

Having a person on the inside, especially in a situation like a drug bust, is helpful because the criminal informant would already have knowledge of the situation, making an arrest easier.

While not monitored in any sort of public database, all confidential informants are vetted prior to being implemented into a crime situation, to ensure that they are the right person to help gain a conviction.

“Confidential informants are used by law enforcement on a case by case basis to help solve crimes,” said Worcester County District Attorney Joseph Early Jr. “The use of confidential informants takes into consideration the information to be obtained, the crime to be solved and the criminal record of the informant.”

More Monitoring

Whitey Bulger

McCarthy wants to see more research go into the role of confidential informants to see if they are beneficial to the community. While some degree of coverage is given, McCarthy feels that the role of confidential informants is something that is swept under the rug, only to be dealt with when an issue arises.

Through better monitoring and tracking of these informants, McCarthy believes that many problems will be alleviated. Currently, it is impossible to know how many informants are in the system or what their precise roles are in combating crime.

McCarthy is also concerned that confidential informants are free in a sense to commit crimes while they are helping out the police. He points to the Whitey Bulger case - where Bulger was enlisted as a confidential informant and was committing crimes while also helping the FBI – as one of the most famous examples.

“We need to start better looking into the role of confidential informants because they undermine accountability in the criminal justice system,” said McCarthy. “Rather than a criminal being charged with a crime, a confidential informant is able to bargain with prosecutors to give up information or someone else for a different crime. While this process is taking place, the informant is free to commit the crimes that got them in trouble in the first place.”

 

Related Slideshow: New England States with Highest Marijuana Arrest Rates

Prev Next

6. Massachusetts

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 51

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 18

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 49

2010 Raw Arrests: 1,191

Photo: Flickr/Blind Nomad

Prev Next

5. Vermont

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 48

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 119

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 51

2010 Raw Arrests: 737

Photo: Flickr/Victor

Prev Next

4. New Hampshire

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 33

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 210

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 41

2010 Raw Arrests: 2,769

Photo: Flickr/Blind Nomad

Prev Next

3. Rhode Island

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 31

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 214

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 43

2010 Raw Arrests: 2,243

Prev Next

2. Maine

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 30

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 214

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 40

2010 Raw Arrests: 2,842

Prev Next

1. Connecticut

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 23

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 247

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 25

2010 Raw Arrests: 8,815

Prev Next

Number One Overall

Washington D.C.

National Rank for Arrests per Capita: 1

2010 Arrests Per Capita: 846

National Rank for Raw Arrests: 34

2010 Raw Arrests: 5,115

Photo: Flickr/Torben Hansen

 
 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

X

Stay Connected — Free
Daily Email